15--RADOME, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF
Overview
Buyer
Place of Performance
NAICS
PSC
Set Aside
Original Source
Timeline
Qualification Details
Fit reasons
- NAICS alignment with historical contract wins in similar service areas.
- Scope strongly matches core technical capabilities and delivery model.
Risks
- Past performance thresholds may require one additional teaming partner.
- Potential clarification needed on staffing minimums before bid/no-bid.
Next steps
Validate eligibility requirements, assign capture owner, and schedule partner outreach to confirm teaming strategy before submission planning.
Quick Summary
The Department of the Navy, specifically NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support, is seeking quotes for the repair and modification of Radomes. This is a Solicitation (RFQ) for repair services, requesting either Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) or Time & Materials (TT&E) pricing. Quotes are due by January 29, 2026.
Scope of Work
This Request for Quote (RFQ) is for the repair and modification of Radomes (Product Service Code: 1560 - Airframe Structural Components). Contractors are required to submit a quote that includes either Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) or Time & Materials (TT&E) pricing, along with estimated costs to repair the specified items.
Contract & Timeline
- Opportunity Type: Solicitation (RFQ)
- Set-Aside: Not Applicable (SBA determined no set-aside recommendation)
- Response Due: January 29, 2026, 6:00 PM EST
- Published Date: October 31, 2025
Submission & Award
Contractors are requested to provide quotes detailing repair costs and pricing structure (FFP or TT&E). The government considers contractual documents (e.g., contracts, purchase orders) to be "issued" when deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile, or sent by other electronic commerce methods, such as email. The Government's acceptance of the contractor's proposal constitutes bilateral agreement to issue contractual documents as detailed herein.
Additional Information
The Small Business Administration representative at NAVSUP WSS has reviewed this requirement and determined that a set-aside recommendation was not applicable for this procurement.