60+ inch Wide-Format Printer IDIQs
Overview
Buyer
Place of Performance
NAICS
PSC
Set Aside
Original Source
Timeline
Qualification Details
Fit reasons
- NAICS alignment with historical contract wins in similar service areas.
- Scope strongly matches core technical capabilities and delivery model.
Risks
- Past performance thresholds may require one additional teaming partner.
- Potential clarification needed on staffing minimums before bid/no-bid.
Next steps
Validate eligibility requirements, assign capture owner, and schedule partner outreach to confirm teaming strategy before submission planning.
Quick Summary
The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) has announced the award of three Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts for 60+ inch Wide-Format Printers. These multiple awards were made to Archive Supplies INC, Print-O-Stat INC, and Reprographic Products Group, INC. The contracts support operations across the Continental United States (CONUS) and Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS), specifically including Japan (Camp Foster, Kadena, and Yokosuka).
Scope of Work
These IDIQ contracts are for the provision of 60+ inch Wide-Format Printers, falling under Product/Service Code 3610 (Printing, Duplicating, And Bookbinding Equipment). The specific requirements under these IDIQs will involve supplying wide-format printing equipment to various Department of Defense locations.
Contract Details
- Type: Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)
- Awarded Vendors:
- Archive Supplies INC (8925 Sterling St, STE 150 Irving, TX 75063-2564)
- Print-O-Stat INC (1128 Roosevelt Ave, York, PA 17404-2300)
- Reprographic Products Group, INC (1100 N Glebe Rd Ste GR2, Arlington, VA 22201-5798)
- Set-Aside: Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)
- Place of Performance: Continental United States (CONUS) and Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS) locations, including Japan (Camp Foster, Kadena, Yokosuka).
- Award Date: February 4, 2026
Evaluation
The awards were made to the lowest priced technically acceptable vendors, indicating a competitive process focused on both cost-effectiveness and technical capability.