Enterprise Sustainment Management System (E-SMS) Universal Cost Assembly Development Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is an Excel spreadsheet containing pricing information and government estimates for an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. It is intended to assist offerors in developing their proposed unit prices.

• Instructions Tab: Provides guidance on how to complete the pricing spreadsheet. Offerors are instructed to review the "GOVERNMENT ESTIMATE DETAILS" and "Performance Work Statement (Section C)". Offerors must propose fully burdened unit prices for seven task types across five ordering period years on the "PROPOSED PRICING TAB". Prices must be inclusive of all costs, overheads, and profit. Offerors should enter a price in all 35 yellow fields on the "PROPOSED PRICING TAB". Green shaded cells should not be changed.
• Government Estimate Details Tab: Outlines the Government's estimated maximum quantities for each of the seven task types for each of the five ordering period years. It also provides estimated component specifications by eleven different domain types for each of the five ordering period years. These quantities are for solicitation purposes only and do not bind the Government to order them.
• Proposed Pricing Tab: A template for offerors to enter their fully burdened unit price schedule for each task type across the five ordering period years.

This spreadsheet is critical for bidders to understand the estimated scope of work in terms of task quantities and asset domains, and to formulate their pricing strategy. Bidders must complete the "PROPOSED PRICING TAB" with their unit prices, ensuring they are fully burdened and inclusive of all costs. Failure to complete the required fields may impact proposal evaluation.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This solicitation is for services to develop a Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System 2nd Generation (MII) project item assemblies and associated data artifacts. These will be used to assess and model the cost of various component repair, replacement, and preventive maintenance services for seven types of cost estimating tasks. The contract will be an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with a 5-year ordering period.

• Development of Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System 2nd Generation (MII) project item assemblies and associated data artifacts.

• Services to assess and model costs for repair, replacement, and preventive maintenance.

• Detailed task types are provided in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) (Attachments 1 and 2).

• Contract Type: IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity)

• Period of Performance: 5-year ordering period.

• Pricing Arrangement: Firm Fixed Price.

• NAICS Code: 541330 (Engineering Services)

• Proposals are due by 12:00 PM CDT on 12 June 2026.

• Submission is electronic via email to CERL-CT-QUOTES@usace.army.mil.

• Evaluation will be based on the Highest Technically Rated with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTR-FRP) approach.

• Non-price evaluation factors include: Technical Knowledge, Experience, and Skills (most highly weighted), Quality Management Process, and Past Performance.

• Price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness.

• The document references "Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside" (52.219-6) and "Utilization of Small Business Concerns" (52.219-8), indicating a potential small business set-aside, but this is not explicitly stated as a requirement for this specific solicitation.

• HUBZone small business concerns may receive a 10% price evaluation preference.

• The solicitation includes numerous FAR and DFARS clauses covering various aspects of contract performance, payment, data rights, and representations.

• Attachments include the Performance Work Statement (PWS), PWS Appendix A, IDIQ Pricing Spreadsheet, and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

Performance Work Statement (PWS)

This PWS outlines the requirements for developing cost model assemblies and associated data artifacts for the Enterprise Sustainment Management System (E-SMS). The goal is to enable E-SMS to assess and model the costs of component repair, replacement, and preventive maintenance services for facility sustainment estimates.

The contractor will develop project item assemblies for various asset domains, including:

• Building facilities
• Utilities
• Waterfront facilities
• Pavements
• Rail assets
• Fuel facilities
• Water control structures
• Bridges
• Training areas & ranges
• Specialized assets
• Memorial assets

Tasks include developing models for:

• Component Type Replacement (Type Ia)
• Component Specification Replacement (Type Ib)
• Component Type Repair (Type IIa)
• Component Specification Repair (Type IIb)
• Component Type Preventive Maintenance (Type IIIa)
• Component Specification Preventive Maintenance (Type IIIb)
• Material Item Re-Price & Assembly Update (Type IV)

Assemblies will be built from the TRACES MII Cost Book, modified, or use custom-developed construction items. Costs will be surveyed and adjusted to the Seattle, WA area.

Not specified in this document.

• Assemblies become Government property.
• Contractor must use the TRACES MII Cost Book and develop custom items when necessary.
• Costs must be based on retail unit cost, excluding local sales tax.
• Documentation of assumptions, logic, and rationale is required.
• Contractor must comply with security requirements, including E-Verify.
• Deliverables include updated project item assemblies and spreadsheets of updated unit costs.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "PWS Appendix A (Attachment 2).pdf", is an attachment to a SAM.gov opportunity record. Its specific purpose is not detailed within the provided metadata, but as an appendix to a Performance Work Statement (PWS), it likely contains detailed specifications, requirements, or supplementary information crucial for understanding the scope of work for potential bidders.

As an appendix, it is expected to contain detailed technical specifications, performance metrics, or other supporting data that elaborates on the PWS. The exact content is not specified in the metadata.

This attachment is critical for bidders to fully understand the technical requirements and performance expectations of the opportunity. Failure to review and understand the contents of this appendix could lead to non-compliant or uncompetitive proposals. Bidders should carefully examine this document for any specific details that may impact their approach, resources, or pricing.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Form PPQ-0), dated 9/30/11. It is designed to collect feedback on a contractor's past performance.

• Contractor Information: Firm name, address, contact details, CAGE code, UEI number.
• Work Performed As: Specifies if the contractor acted as Prime, Sub, Joint Venture, or Other.
• Contract Information: Contract number, type, title, location, award/completion dates, original and final contract prices.
• Project Description: Details on work complexity and relevance to the current submission.
• Client Information: Client's name, title, contact details, and role in the project.
• Performance Ratings: A detailed rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Applicable) with definitions for evaluating contractor performance across various categories.
• Evaluation Categories: Quality, Schedule/Timeliness, Customer Satisfaction, Management/Personnel/Labor, Cost/Financial Management, Safety/Security, and General.
• Narrative Section: Space for detailed comments on strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other relevant information.

This form is used by clients to evaluate a contractor's past performance. Bidders may be asked to provide this questionnaire to their previous clients as part of their proposal submission. The ratings and narrative feedback provided on this form will be used by the government to assess the bidder's past performance, which is often a significant evaluation factor in contract awards. Understanding the criteria and rating scale will help bidders prepare to request and submit this information effectively.