F-16 Harness Multiple Award IDIQ Acquisition
Overview
Buyer
Place of Performance
NAICS
PSC
Set Aside
Original Source
Timeline
Qualification Details
Fit reasons
- NAICS alignment with historical contract wins in similar service areas.
- Scope strongly matches core technical capabilities and delivery model.
Risks
- Past performance thresholds may require one additional teaming partner.
- Potential clarification needed on staffing minimums before bid/no-bid.
Next steps
Validate eligibility requirements, assign capture owner, and schedule partner outreach to confirm teaming strategy before submission planning.
A. 21 May 2020. This is a DRAFT RFP. Any information pertaining to the following needs to be submitted by Monday, 22 June 2020, 2:00 PM (MST).
1. Offerors that need to obtain the following documents to provide a proposal for the F-16 Harness Solicitation # FA8232-20-R-3000 will need to contract LM Aero to enter into a PIA to obtain these documents.
16PR15634 Rev b
16PR15635 Rev d
16PR15636 Rev c
The LM Aero Contracts POC for this activity is Mr. Kameron Turner (kameron.m.turner@lmco.com). The data will be provided under the conditions of a Proprietary Information Agreement (PIA) and the competitors may contact Mr. Turner directly to complete the PIA process. Once the PIA process is complete, Carole Johnson will then distribute the copy to that individual supplier POC via the Secure Information Exchange (SIE) application under solicitation number subject line with the instruction:
The attachments are provided for _xxx_ use in responding to Solicitation No. FA8232-20-R-3000 and should be handled in accordance with PIA Control No. _xxx_.
2. Offerors are highly encouraged to fully review this DRAFT RFP package and provide a list of any referenced documents (that would be required for the offeror to submit a complete proposal) that are included within the solicitation and any attachments, but are not physically attached to this DRAFT RFP package.
3. Offerors are highly encouraged to look carefully at the DRAFT delivery schedules that are included in the DRAFT sample task. If the offeror may not be able to propose to these DRAFT delivery schedules, it is highly encouraged to submit a response stating the reasons why these DRAFT delivery schedules are not obtainable and provide recommended delivery schedules with rationale of why these dates should be considered for the final RFP. Offerors will not be allowed to recommend different delivery schedules when the final RFP is released. The DRAFT is the time for potential offerors to provide recommendations/rationale.
4. Offerors are highly encouraged to review the DRAFT sample task technical data packages to review all the parts/part numbers and provide a list of alternate parts/part numbers and rationale why the original parts/part numbers cannot be supplied. Offerors may not be allowed to recommend different parts/part numbers when the final RFP is released. The DRAFT is the time for potential offerors to provide recommendations/rationale.
5. The Government’s current plan is to allow 45 days for proposal submissions following the release of the final RFP. If there are issues with this, Offerors are requested to provide rationale as to why a longer duration would be needed.
6. Offerors are highly encouraged to review all documents and provide feedback, comments and/or questions.
B. 22 May 2020. The purpose of this posting is also to provide a synopsis/presolicitation notice in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 5.204/5.207. See "Harness Presolicitation Notice" attachment for details.
C. 8 June 2020. The purpose of this posting is to update the Lockheed Martin POC from Mr. Tom Fowler to Mr. Kameron Turner. See Paragraph A for the updated information.