Global Protective Services (GPS) - Market Research

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a map illustrating the geographic areas of responsibility for the U.S. Combatant Commands. It also lists the U.S. Army Regional Commands (AREC) Directors and their respective areas.

• A world map color-coded to show the regions covered by:
  • USNORTHCOM (U.S. Northern Command)
  • USPACOM (U.S. Indo-Pacific Command)
  • USEUCOM (U.S. European Command)
  • USCENTCOM (U.S. Central Command)
  • USAFRICOM (U.S. Africa Command)
  • USSOUTHCOM (U.S. Southern Command)
• A list of AREC Directors with their associated U.S. Army regional commands (e.g., U.S. Army Central, U.S. Army Europe).

This map provides essential geographical context for understanding the operational areas relevant to the opportunity. Bidders may need to reference this to understand which Combatant Command or Army region is associated with the requirement, potentially impacting logistical, operational, or reporting considerations.

Amendment / Modification

This document, Amendment 0004, revises Section M (Evaluation Factors for Award) of the solicitation for the GLOBAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES (GPS) MULTIPLE-AWARD INDEFINITE-DELIVERY INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (MA-IDIQ) contract.

• Section M - Basis for Award: Clarifies that price will not be evaluated during this source selection but will be evaluated at the individual task order level.
• Section M - Number of Contracts to be Awarded: States that the Government intends to award one contract to each and all qualifying Offerors who meet the Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) of at least 57,600 points (80% of the maximum score).
• Section M - IDIQ Ceiling: Updates the overall IDIQ ceiling to $10,330,446,190.46 for ten years.
• Section M - Minimum Quantity Task Order: Specifies that an initial task order will be awarded to each IDIQ contractor for initial CDRL Submission at a value of $1,000.00.
• Section M - Proposal Substantiation: Warns that unsubstantiated or misleading claims for Prior Technical Experience could result in a unilateral downward adjustment of the Offeror's score.
• Section M - Proposal Compliance: Emphasizes that failure to comply with any solicitation requirement may result in the proposal being deemed unacceptable.
• Section M - Offeror Responsibility: Notes that the Contracting Officer may consider information beyond the proposal for responsibility determination.
• Section M - Evaluation Factors and Methodology: Outlines a four-step process for proposal validation and evaluation, including responsiveness, past performance, and scoring validation.
• Section M - HTRO Step One - Responsiveness: Details the review process for proposal compliance, including Secret Facilities Clearance and successful ANSI/ASIS PSC.1 Audits/ISO 18788 Audit Report, and the MTTR requirement.
• Section M - HTRO Step Two – Past Performance: Describes the evaluation of Offeror's past and current performance, including recency, relevancy, quality assessment, and performance confidence assessment.
• Section M - Pre-award documentation (EEO Clearance and Facilities Clearance): Specifies the evaluation of Secret Facilities Clearance for offerors and their entities.
• Section M - HTRO Step Three – Scoring Validation: Explains the process for validating Offeror's self-rated scores, including the use of work samples and the potential for unilateral downward adjustment.

This amendment primarily impacts the evaluation criteria and methodology. Offerors should ensure their proposals meet all updated requirements, particularly regarding the MTTR, past performance documentation, and facility clearances. The proposal submission deadline is not explicitly mentioned as changed in this amendment, but bidders should review the entire solicitation for any related updates.

Amendment / Modification

This document is Amendment 0004 to the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for Global Protective Services (GPS), dated 12 February 2025. It serves to update the PWS.

This amendment modifies the existing PWS. Specific details of the changes are not provided in the amendment cover document itself, but are incorporated into the revised PWS.

This amendment updates the PWS. Bidders should refer to the full, amended PWS document for any changes that may impact proposal submissions or requirements.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a revised self-scoring matrix (Attachment 0006) for the HTRO (High Threat Remote Operations) requirement, specifically related to Amendment 0004. It provides bidders with a tool to self-assess their qualifications against specific evaluation criteria.

• Total Points Available: 72,000
• Minimum Technical Rating Threshold (MTTR): 57,600 points. Offerors must meet or exceed this threshold to be eligible for award.
• Instructions: Bidders must input their company name and indicate their status regarding ANSI PSC.1 Audits and Top Secret Facility Clearances on Tab 1. Failure to meet these initial requirements (Pass/Yes for both) disqualifies the offeror from submitting a proposal.
• Self-Scoring: On Tab 2, bidders will use dropdown menus to input self-scores for various evaluation categories, which are weighted. Scores are automatically calculated, and the total self-score is displayed. A red indicator means the MTTR is not met; green means it is met.
• Evaluation Categories: These cover experience in areas such as ANSI/ISO audits, OCONUS security operations (armed personnel, contract value, number of contracts, housing/life support, specific geographic locations like CENTCOM, AFRICOM, EUCOM, INDOPACOM, SOUTHCOM), and personnel management (FTEs, EDD/DDD teams).
• ANSI PSC.1 Audit Note: For Joint Ventures (JVs), only one venturer needs to be PSC.1 compliant to meet the minimum requirement, though full certification for all is encouraged.

This matrix is crucial for bidders to understand the technical evaluation criteria and to gauge their own company's eligibility and competitiveness for the HTRO opportunity. It requires bidders to self-certify their experience and capabilities against specific metrics, and meeting the MTTR is a mandatory condition for award.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document lists the authorized ordering agencies for the Global Protective Services (GPS) contract. It serves to inform potential awardees and contracting officers which entities are permitted to place orders under the GPS contract.

• Authorized Ordering Agency: 409th Contracting Support Brigade.
• Responsibility: Authorized ordering agencies must adhere to all terms and conditions of the Contract and its attachments, specifically referencing Attachment 0004, the Ordering Guide.
• Contact Information: For inquiries, vendors can reach out to the GPS team at usarmy.ria.acc.mbx.gps@army.mil.

This attachment is crucial for understanding the distribution and ordering channels for the GPS contract. Bidders should note which agencies are authorized to place orders, as this may impact contract performance and management.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, titled "Standard Operating Procedures & Ordering Guide for Global Protective Services (GPS) Centralized & Decentralized Ordering," provides detailed guidance for using the GPS contract vehicle to award Task Orders (TOs) for Private Security Contractors (PSCs). It outlines the procedures, roles, and responsibilities for initiating, managing, and administering GPS TOs.

• Scope of GPS: Defines the objective of the GPS contract vehicle, which is to provide PSCs for peace and stability initiatives in various operational environments, supporting relief, recovery, and reconstruction activities.
• Contract Performance Period: The MATOC contract has a five-year base ordering period and a five-year optional period, totaling up to 10 years.
• Task Order Performance Period: Individual TO performance periods can extend beyond the base contract period.
• Contract Capacity: The total NTE program ceiling for the GPS MATOC IDIQ Contract is $10,330,446,190.46.
• Authority to Place Task Orders: Outlines the delegated authority for Procuring Contracting Officers (PCOs) to award and administer TOs, requiring approval of a Pre-Award Information Form.
• Roles and Responsibilities: Details the duties of the GPS PCO, Task Order PCO, Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), and GPS Contractors.
• Placing Orders: Describes the process for placing orders, including Task Order Performance Work Statements (PWS) and the addition of clauses at the TO level.
• Task Order Competitions: Specifies minimum requirements for TO competitions, including quantity of positions, period of performance, country of performance, risk, and GFP.
• Evaluation Factors: Outlines evaluation methods (LPTA, Best Value Tradeoff, HTRO) and factors for TO proposals, including current contract performance, business operation licenses, technical capability, and price.
• Authorized Ordering Agencies: Lists agencies authorized for decentralized ordering.
• Attachment A: Requires specific information for each TO request, including Contracting Activity, Points of Contact, Requirement Title, Location, SAW details, Contract Background, Clearance Level, IGE value, and Performance Metrics.

This guide is crucial for potential bidders as it details the entire process for how Task Orders will be issued under the GPS MATOC. It clarifies the scope of services, contract structure, roles of government personnel and contractors, competition procedures, and evaluation criteria for Task Orders. Understanding these procedures is essential for preparing compliant and competitive proposals for individual Task Orders issued under this contract vehicle.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document outlines the "Explosive Detection Canine Team Assessment & Certification Standards" dated September 17, 2024. It details the requirements for Explosive Detection Canine (EDC) teams operating under the WPS III contract. It serves as a critical reference for understanding the standards and procedures for canine validation, training, and health care.

• Two Models of Service: The document describes two primary models for EDC services: Government-Furnished Property (GFP-EDC) and Contractor-Acquired Property (CAP-EDC). The choice between these models is determined at the task order level.
• Training and Validation: It details the requirements for both government-provided and contractor-provided training, including proficiency, obedience, and skills validation. A significant portion is dedicated to the Diplomatic Security Canine Validation Testing, which includes the Diplomatic Security Odor Recognition Test (DSORT) and the Diplomatic Security Operational Test (DSOT).
• Testing Standards: Specifics on the types of explosives and distractors used in testing are provided, along with the procedures, set-up, and evaluation criteria for both DSORT and DSOT.
• Canine Health and Medical Care: Requirements for both government-provided and contractor-provided canine health and medical care services (H&MCS) are outlined, including examinations, record-keeping, and veterinary clinic standards.
• Task Order Performance Evaluation: The document specifies that EDC teams will be retested using DSORT/DSOT standards no less frequently than every 245 days, with potential evaluations at the task order performance location.

This document is essential for any bidder proposing to provide Explosive Detection Canine services under the WPS III contract. It clearly defines the performance standards, validation processes, training requirements, and health care obligations that successful offerors must meet. Understanding these detailed standards is crucial for developing a compliant and competitive proposal and for successfully executing the contract if awarded.

Amendment / Modification

This document is Amendment 0007 to Solicitation W519TC-24-R-0011, dated 26 February 2025. It revises Section L, "Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors," for the GLOBAL PROTECTIVE SERVICES (GPS) MULTIPLE-AWARD INDEFINITE-DELIVERY INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (MA-IDIQ) contract.

• Section L: Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors.

This amendment provides updated instructions for proposal submission, including:

• Proposals must be submitted electronically via the PIEE Solicitation Module.
• Proposal files must be in .pdf, .docx, or .xlsx format.
• Specific requirements for work samples, including a maximum of 60 unique work samples.
• Detailed instructions for the "Business Section," "Past Performance," and "Prior Technical Experience" sections of the proposal.
• Requirements for the Self-Scoring Matrix and Cross Reference Matrix.
• Clarifications on contract types, task orders, and the definition of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs).
• Specific data required for various categories within the work samples, such as annual value, number of contracts, and performance locations (e.g., OCONUS, EUCOM, CENTCOM, AFRICOM, INDOPACOM, SOUTHCOM).

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a matrix detailing Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) items for the Global Protective Services (GPS) opportunity, referenced as W519TC-24-R-0011. It outlines specific deliverables required from the contractor, their associated PWS references, and the frequency or trigger for submission.

• CDRL Title: Lists the specific deliverable required (e.g., Host Nation Business License, Quality Control Plan, Daily Situation Report).
• PWS Reference: Links the deliverable to a specific section in the Performance Work Statement.
• Submission Frequency/Trigger: Indicates when the deliverable is due (e.g., Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Annually, Upon Award, Upon Request, Event Driven, Task Order Proposal, After Mobilization Completion).
• Notes: Provides additional context or specific instructions for certain deliverables.

This matrix is crucial for bidders to understand the reporting and documentation obligations associated with the GPS contract. It highlights key compliance items such as licenses, plans (QCP, Mobilization, Communication, Property Control), reports (Situation, Incident, Accident), personnel records, and inventory lists. Bidders must review this to ensure they can meet all specified requirements and factor the effort and cost of producing these deliverables into their proposals. Pay close attention to items marked with an asterisk (*) or those requiring submission at specific proposal stages (e.g., TO Proposal, Upon Award).

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document outlines the qualification standards for Private Security Company (PSC) personnel in the use of firearms, specifically pistols, rifles, and shotguns. It details the requirements for initial live-fire qualification and semi-annual requalification, including the use of approved simulators if live-fire conditions are not possible.

• Pistol Qualification: Covers standards for pistol use, including target type, ammunition requirements (50 rounds), minimum passing score (35 hits), and procedures for handling malfunctions.
• Rifle Qualification: Details standards for rifle use, including target type, ammunition requirements (36 rifle rounds, 4 pistol rounds), magazine loading specifications, minimum passing score (35 hits), and specific course of fire stations (Stations 1-12).
• Shotgun Qualification: Outlines standards for shotgun use, including target type, ammunition requirements (10 rounds of 12 gauge #00 Buckshot), minimum passing score (67 hits or 75%), and specific course of fire stations (Stations 1-4).
• General Requirements: All training is recorded and available for inspection. Qualification standards apply regardless of specific weapon type within a category.

This document is critical for any bidder whose personnel will be required to carry firearms as part of the contract. It specifies the mandatory training and qualification standards that must be met, directly impacting personnel readiness and operational capability. Bidders must ensure their proposed personnel meet or can meet these rigorous qualification requirements.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification. It provides security requirements for a contract, including facility and personnel clearance levels, safeguarding information, and access to classified information.

• Contract Information: Identifies the prime contract number (W519TC-24-0011) and indicates it is not a follow-on contract.
• Security Classification: Specifies the required facility clearance (Secret) and level of safeguarding (None).
• Contractor and Subcontractor Information: Details for the prime contractor and any subcontractors, including name, address, CAGE code, and cognizant security office, are to be determined (TBD).
• Procurement Identification: States that the procurement is for guard and protective security services supporting the Department of Defense (DoD) and other Federal agencies, potentially involving armed/unarmed security operations within designated OCONUS COCOMs.
• Access Requirements: Outlines the types of information the contractor will require access to, including potential access to classified information (SCI, Non-SCI), COMSEC, Intelligence, NATO, and Foreign Government Information. It also specifies requirements for access to SIPRNET and NIPRNET.
• Performance Requirements: Details whether the contractor will have access to classified information at other facilities, receive/generate classified material, fabricate/modify/store classified hardware, perform services only, or have access to U.S. classified information outside the U.S. It also notes requirements for using the Defense Technical Information Center and Defense Courier Service, and potential TEMPEST and OPSEC requirements.
• Security Guidance: References the National Industrial Security Program (NISP) and DoD 5220.22-M, NISPOM, for security policies and procedures. It states that TOP SECRET clearance is not required at the Base IDIQ level, only a SECRET FCL, but specific Task Orders may require higher clearances or access.
• Additional Requirements: Indicates that additional security requirements may be established and that the contractor must immediately notify the ISPM if employees no longer require access or upon contract termination.

This form is critical for bidders to understand the security implications of the contract. It outlines the necessary security clearances for personnel, facility requirements, and the types of classified information that may be handled. Bidders must assess their ability to meet these security requirements, including obtaining the necessary clearances and adhering to safeguarding procedures, as failure to do so can impact contract performance and eligibility.