Guam Defense System (GDS) Joint Program Office (JPO)
Overview
Buyer
Place of Performance
NAICS
PSC
Set Aside
Original Source
Timeline
Qualification Details
Fit reasons
- NAICS alignment with historical contract wins in similar service areas.
- Scope strongly matches core technical capabilities and delivery model.
Risks
- Past performance thresholds may require one additional teaming partner.
- Potential clarification needed on staffing minimums before bid/no-bid.
Next steps
Validate eligibility requirements, assign capture owner, and schedule partner outreach to confirm teaming strategy before submission planning.
Quick Summary
This document, Amendment 2 (AMD02), is an amendment to a previous justification and approval for an exception to fair opportunity related to the Guam Defense System (GDS) Joint Program Office (JPO). The primary purpose of this amendment is to increase the estimated value of the associated Task Order (TO) and incorporate additional resources and services that were initially omitted from the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE).
Scope of Change
- Increased Estimated Value: The estimated value of the Task Order has been increased.
- Additional Resources: The scope now includes tools, storage, and compute for Sentinel and Defender for Impact Level (IL)5, as well as Sentinel and Express Routes.
- Context: These items were inadvertently omitted from the initial cost estimate.
Contract & Timeline
- Opportunity Type: Justification (Amendment)
- Department/Agency: DEPT OF DEFENSE / DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY (DISA)
- Product/Service Code: DB10 (Computing Delivered As A Service in a Public or Private Cloud Environment)
- Published Date: February 6, 2026
- Set-Aside: None specified.
Additional Notes
AMD01, a prior amendment, involved market research with Amazon Web Services (AWS), which was ultimately excluded due to an inability to meet required response times. This AMD02 primarily impacts the estimated value and scope of the Task Order and does not appear to alter proposal submission deadlines or evaluation factors, as it pertains to the justification for an exception to fair opportunity, not a direct solicitation.