One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services Plus (OASIS+) Unrestricted Continuously Open Solicitation

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a Solicitation, Offer, and Award form (Standard Form 33) for a procurement action. It outlines the terms and conditions for potential offerors to submit proposals.

The solicitation includes sections covering:

• Solicitation/Contract Form

• Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs

• Description/Specifications/Work Statement

• Packaging and Marking

• Inspection and Acceptance

• Deliveries or Performance

• Contract Administration Data

• Special Contract Requirements

• Contract Clauses

• List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments

• Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors

• Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

• Evaluation Factors for Award

• The solicitation number is 47QRCA23R0006.

• The offer is due by 6/15/2023.

• The offer acceptance period is 365 calendar days (unless a different period is inserted by the offeror).

• Offers must be submitted to General Services Administration/FAS/PSHC, 1800 F Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20405.

• Specific submission instructions are detailed in Section L.

• Evaluation factors for award are detailed in Section M.

• The solicitation type is indicated as 'Negotiated (RFP) Request for Proposal'.

• Authority for using other than full open competition is cited under 10 U.S.C. 3204(a) and 41 U.S.C. 3304(a).

• This solicitation is for a rated order under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System.

• The document is 11 pages of 201.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is the J.P-6 Past Performance Rating Form, used to evaluate an offeror's past performance on previous projects. It is intended to be filled out by a "Rater" (e.g., Contracting Officer, COR, or customer official) to provide an assessment of the contractor's performance.

• Contractor Information: Fields for Contractor Name, Contract Number, Order Number, Project Title, Project Value, and Total Period of Performance.
• Rater Information: Fields for the Rater's Name, Title, Agency/Customer, Phone, E-mail, and Signature.
• Performance Criteria: The form includes five rating categories:
  1. Technical (Quality of Service)
  2. Cost Control
  3. Schedule/Timeliness
  4. Management or Business Relations
  5. Small Business Subcontracting (only applicable to Federal Prime Contract Awards)
  6. Other (as applicable) (e.g., trafficking violations, tax delinquency, etc.)
• Adjectival Ratings: For each criterion, raters select an adjectival rating (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) and provide definitions for each. Comments are required for Marginal, Unsatisfactory, and Not Applicable ratings.

This form is crucial for bidders as it outlines the specific criteria and rating scales that will be used to evaluate their past performance. Understanding these criteria will help offerors prepare relevant past performance information and ensure their past performance references are well-documented and can be positively assessed by the government.

Amendment / Modification

This document, Amendment 0008, provides the OASIS Plus Domain Qualifications Matrices and Scorecards. It details the qualification thresholds for various OASIS+ Domains for both Small Business/Socioeconomic (SB/SE) and Unrestricted (UR) contract types. Key changes include specific credit allocations for different qualifications within each domain, such as QP Relevance, QP Scale, QP Integrated Experience, QP Management & Staffing, Past Performance, and Federal Experience Projects (FEPs). It also outlines the qualification thresholds for each domain, with SB/SE generally requiring 36 out of 50 credits and UR requiring 42 out of 50 credits (with an exception for the Enterprise Solutions Domain at 45 out of 50 credits).

This document details the qualification criteria and scoring for various domains (T&E, M&A, ENT, ENV, FAC, LOG, FS, HC, BA, M&PR, SS, R&D, INTEL) as referenced in Sections L and M of the RFP. Specific sheets within the workbook provide detailed matrices and scorecards for each domain and contract type (SB/SE and UNR).

Offerors must meet or exceed the domain-specific qualification threshold to be eligible for award. The document emphasizes that proposal submissions must adhere to instructions in Section L, particularly L.5.2 (Qualifications Matrix) and L.5.3 (Federal Experience Projects), and will be evaluated per Section M. It also clarifies that for offers including proposal submissions to multiple Domains, certain items listed in Sections L.5.2, L.5.3, L.5.4, L.5.5, and L.5.6 of the RFP need to be included within each Domain proposal submission. The OASIS+ Submission Portal allows for uploading proposal assets and applying them across Domains.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0008) re-opens the OASIS+ RFP and incorporates several changes, including:

• Updates related to the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) and GSA deviations.
• Revisions to how contractors update information via the OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP) and FedConnect.
• An increase in the number of Domains from seven to thirteen.
• Clarifications on the Minimum Contract Guarantee.
• Updates to FAR references, including Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs), Multiyear Contracting, and Options.
• Requirement for Offerors to represent their size status for each NAICS Code within proposed Domains.
• Addition of five new Domains: Business Administration, Marketing and Public Relations, Human Capital, Financial Services, and Social Services.
• Minor adjustments to scope tables and addition of sections for new domains.
• Changes to detail services not in scope and revisions to Deliverables and Compliances tables.
• Updates regarding performance reports, contract specialist training, and Corporate OASIS+ Contract Managers (COCMs).
• Revisions to language concerning Contractor Teaming Arrangements (CTAs), including notification requirements for changes in team member size.
• Updates to various attachments (J-1, J-2, J-3, J-4, J-5, J.P-1 through J.P-13) related to qualifications, NAICS codes, direct labor rates, and templates.
• Clarifications on proposal format, joint venture requirements, and mentor-protégé relationships.
• Revisions to sections concerning facility clearances, ISO 27001, CPARS ratings, and cost/price templates.
• Updates to indirect cost rate submissions and financial data requirements.
• Addition of sections regarding rejection of previous offers and acceptability review.

Numerous sections of the RFP have been modified, including Sections B, C, F, G, H, K, L, and M, as well as various attachments.

Offerors must acknowledge this amendment as part of their offer submission in the OASIS+ Submission Portal (OSP). The proposal submission capability will go live on January 12, 2026.

Amendment / Modification

Amendment 0008, issued on January 12, 2026, updates the solicitation for RFP No. 47QRCA23R0006, OASIS+ MAC Program Unrestricted (UR).

This amendment does not explicitly detail specific sections changed or replaced within the document. However, it signifies an update to the overall solicitation.

This amendment updates the solicitation to its current status as of FAC:2025-06, dated 10/01/2025. Bidders should ensure they are referencing the most current version of the solicitation, including this amendment, for proposal preparation and submission.

Amendment / Modification

This document is Amendment 0008 to Attachment J.P-5, which details functional areas and sub-areas for claiming "Integrated Experience" credit in accordance with solicitation Section L.5.2.3.3.

• The amendment provides updated details for Functional Areas and Sub-areas, including:
  • Section 1: Functional Areas and Sub-areas Included in this Solicitation (Domains)
  • Section 2: Additional Functional Areas and Sub-areas for Claiming Integrated Experience

This amendment clarifies and potentially expands the scope of functional areas and sub-areas relevant for "Integrated Experience" evaluation. Bidders should review the updated details to ensure accurate representation of their experience in proposals.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "J.P-8 Direct Labor Hourly Rate Ranges (Amd 0008).xlsx", provides the direct labor hourly rate ranges for various Subject Matter Expert (SME) labor categories. It is an attachment in support of the OASIS+ solicitation and references Section L.5.7 of the RFP for further information.

• Labor Categories: Lists specific OASIS+ labor categories with corresponding SOC Numbers.
• Hourly Rate Ranges: Provides a "LOW" and "HIGH" hourly rate for each labor category.
• Amendment 0008: Indicates this is an updated version of the rate ranges.

Bidders should use this document to understand the expected direct labor hourly rate ranges for SME positions as defined by the OASIS+ solicitation. This information is crucial for developing accurate and compliant pricing proposals, ensuring that proposed labor rates fall within the specified low and high bounds. It helps in understanding the government's expectations for labor costs associated with the opportunity.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a "Model Individual Subcontracting Plan" template intended to guide contractors in preparing their individual subcontracting plans. It is not a fill-in-the-blank form and does not replace FAR requirements. It outlines GSA's encouraged objectives for subcontracting.

• Applicability: Applies to specific federal agency (GSA) single contracts, covering the entire contract period including options.
• Goals: Must contain goals based on the offeror's planned subcontracting and purchasing.
• Indirect Costs: May include indirect costs incurred for common or joint purposes, allocated on a prorated basis.
• Option Periods: Plans must include separate goals for base and option periods, and a sum total for all periods.
• FAR Requirements: References specific FAR clauses (e.g., 52.219-9) and statutory requirements (15 USC 637(d)).
• Small Business Categories: Emphasizes opportunities for Small Business (SB), including Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs), Indian tribes, Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), HUBZone Small Business, and Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB).
• Reporting: Details requirements for Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) and Summary Subcontracting Reports (SSRs) submitted via the eSRS system.
• Recordkeeping: Outlines required records for compliance, including source lists, outreach efforts, and award data.
• Good Faith Effort: Stresses the importance of demonstrating a "good faith effort" to achieve subcontracting goals.

This document is crucial for bidders who will be required to submit a subcontracting plan as part of their proposal. It provides detailed instructions, requirements, and guidance on how to develop, structure, and submit a compliant subcontracting plan, including how to set goals, identify potential sources, and meet reporting obligations. Understanding this document is essential for ensuring a proposal meets the government's subcontracting requirements and is considered for award.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document contains questionnaires and instructions related to Cybersecurity and Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) for potential bidders. It includes pre-award evaluation instructions and a questionnaire for basic safeguarding of covered contractor information systems, as well as a post-award deliverable template for a C-SCRM plan.

Pre-Award Evaluation Instructions:

• Provides instructions for completing a questionnaire on basic safeguarding of covered contractor information systems.
• Defines key terms such as 'Covered contractor information system' and 'Federal contract information'.
• Includes a questionnaire with sections on Contact Information, Access Control, Identification and Authentication, Media Protection, Physical Protection, System and Communications Protection, and System and Information Integrity.

Post-Award Deliverable - C-SCRM Plan Template:

• Outlines requirements for a Cyber-Supply Chain Risk Management Plan.
• Sections cover Supply Chain Provenance, Supply Chain Management and Supplier Governance, Information Security, Physical Security, Personnel Security, Supply Chain Integrity, and Supply Chain Resilience.
• Questions focus on identifying suppliers, verifying ownership, analyzing threats, managing risks, ensuring information security, physical security measures, personnel security programs, and supply chain resilience.

Bidders must review these documents to understand the cybersecurity and supply chain risk management requirements that will be assessed during the pre-award phase and potentially required post-award. Completing the questionnaires and understanding the C-SCRM plan requirements are crucial for demonstrating compliance and suitability for the opportunity.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "ATTACHMENT J.P-2 Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) SAMPLE," provides a sample of an FPDS report and instructions on how bidders can use it to verify project experience as required by Section L.5.2.3.1 of the OASIS+ RFP. It details the steps to access and interpret FPDS data and includes a crosswalk table mapping elements within the OSP (Offeror's Submission Package) to corresponding data fields in FPDS.

• FPDS Access: Instructions to visit www.fpds.gov and use the ezSearch function.
• Data Fields: Identifies key FPDS fields for verifying project experience, such as "Legal Business Name," "Award ID," "Period of Performance," "Total Contract Value," and "Principal NAICS Code."
• Crosswalk Table: Maps OSP elements (e.g., Prime Contractor, Contract Number, NAICS Code) to specific FPDS data fields.
• Sample FPDS Report: Includes a sample FPDS report (pages 3-5) illustrating the data fields and format.
• Alternative Verification: Outlines that if an FPDS report is unavailable or insufficient, verification may be provided through other documents as identified in section L.5.1.3.1.

This attachment is crucial for bidders to understand how to properly document and verify their past project experience to meet the requirements of the OASIS+ RFP. It guides them on extracting relevant information from FPDS to support their proposals, particularly concerning scoring elements related to project experience.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is an Excel spreadsheet (Attachment J.P-9) serving as a Cost/Price Template to be used by offerors in support of the OASIS+ solicitation. It provides a structured format for submitting cost and pricing information, including direct labor rates, indirect costs, and profit.

• Instructions Sheet: Details how to complete the template, including:
  • Entering the Offeror's Official Legal Entity Name and SAM UEID.
  • Inputting indirect cost pool names and percentages (Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A, and up to 10 additional optional rates). Offerors can edit pool names and formulas to match their specific indirect rate structure.
  • Entering profit percentage.
  • Inputting direct labor rates for 20 labor categories.
  • The template includes pre-populated formulas for calculating loaded hourly labor rates, which offerors can edit to reflect their actual indirect rates and allocation bases.
  • A fixed 4.41% escalation factor is embedded for Years 1-15, which offerors cannot change.
  • Caution is advised against altering the spreadsheet structure (adding/deleting rows/columns) to ensure compatibility with the OASIS+ Submission Portal.
• Cost-Price Template Sheet: Contains the actual template with columns for:
  • Labor SOC Number and OASIS+ Labor Category.
  • Direct Labor Rate.
  • Indirect cost pools (Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A, and up to 10 additional optional rates).
  • Profit.
  • Loaded Hourly Labor Rates for Years 1 through 15, which are automatically calculated based on inputs and escalation.

Offerors must use this template to submit their detailed cost and pricing proposal. Understanding the instructions for inputting direct labor rates, indirect cost pools, profit, and the pre-defined escalation factor is crucial for accurate proposal preparation. Any deviations from the standard indirect rate structure or allocation bases must be clearly described in the Basis of Estimate, as referenced in RFP Section L.5.7.3.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment J-1 OASIS+ LABOR CATEGORIES and BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS STANDARD OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS," defines the labor categories used for the OASIS+ contract. It aligns these categories with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. This attachment is crucial for understanding how labor will be categorized and potentially priced for task orders under the OASIS+ contract.

• General Alignment: OASIS+ labor categories are aligned with the OMB Standard Occupational Classification Manual, which includes compensation data from the Department of Labor and BLS.

• SOC System: Explains the purpose of the federal SOC system for classifying workers.

• Labor Category Definitions: Defines four levels of labor categories:

  • JUNIOR: Applies fundamental concepts, requires practical experience and training, works under supervision. Generally up to 3 years of relevant experience.
  • JOURNEYMAN: Possesses expertise on complex assignments, operates with latitude, contributes to deliverables. Generally 3 to 10 years of relevant experience.
  • SENIOR: Possesses comprehensive knowledge, plans and leads major assignments, functions as a technical expert. Generally over 10 years of relevant experience.
  • SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME): Provides technical/management leadership, establishes goals, has domain and expert technical knowledge, may supervise. Qualifications are exceptional/highly unique, often identified as industry leaders.

• Contractor Deviations: Contractors may deviate from these definitions in task order proposals, provided deviations are clearly identified.

• BLS SOC Updates: Contractors are responsible for incorporating updated BLS SOC systems if they are updated during the contract period.

• Task Order Specificity: The document clarifies that these labor categories are not mandatory for the Ordering Activity to use, and task order solicitations will indicate if they apply.

• Reporting Requirement: However, contractors are required to map all labor categories subject to task order reporting to these standardized categories for reporting awarded rates and prices paid in the Sales Reporting Portal.

• Proposal Preparation: Bidders should use these definitions as a baseline when developing their proposals for task orders, understanding how their proposed labor will be classified and potentially evaluated.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a "Model Commercial Subcontracting Plan Instructional Reminders" template. It provides guidance and instructions for contractors preparing a commercial subcontracting plan. It is not a mandatory form but a tool to ensure statutory elements are included.

• When to use: When the company determines this is the best type of plan for its purchasing model and the supplies/services meet the definition of "commercial" per FAR Part 2.
• Nature of the plan: It is not a fill-in-the-blank form, does not replace FAR requirements (like FAR 52.219-9), and reflects GSA's encouraged objectives.
• Scope: Relates to planned subcontracting for both commercial and Government business, covers the company's fiscal year, and applies to the entire production of commercial items or a portion thereof. It must include indirect costs.
• Requirements: Details statutory requirements (15 USC 637(d)), FAR clauses to review (e.g., 52.219-8, 52.219-9), and the importance of demonstrating "maximum practicable opportunity" for small businesses.
• Preparation: Outlines steps for preparing the plan, including market research, identifying socio-economic categories of suppliers, and developing goals.
• Submission: Specifies submission to the Contracting Officer.
• Post-Award: Includes requirements for reporting (Summary Subcontract Report - SSR) and recordkeeping.
• Key Definitions: Differentiates between SAM and SBS, and defines "good faith effort."

This document is crucial for bidders who are required to submit a subcontracting plan as part of their proposal. It guides them on how to develop, structure, and submit a compliant commercial subcontracting plan, including setting goals, identifying potential subcontractors, and understanding reporting requirements. Failure to submit an acceptable subcontracting plan can make an offeror ineligible for award.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a financial data input template (Attachment J.P-13) provided in support of the OASIS+ solicitation. It is intended for offerors to input their financial information for evaluation.

• Offeror Information: Fields for Offeror Name, SAM UEID, JV Team Member Name (if applicable), and Entity SAM UEID.
• Financial Categories: Sections for Current Assets, PPE, Other Assets, Total Assets, Current Liabilities, Other Liabilities, Total Liabilities, Net Sales, and Net Income.
• Data Input: Requires financial information by year for the previous three years (Year 1 oldest, Year 3 latest).

1. Offerors must input financial information by year for each applicable category from their financial statements, covering the required previous three years, as per Solicitation Section L.5.8.3.
2. Data provided will be verified against submitted financial statements during evaluations.
3. Unpopulated joint ventures must submit a separate J.P-13 template for each JV member, mentor, and/or protégé, as per Solicitation Section L.5.1.3.1.

This template is crucial for offerors to accurately report their historical financial performance as required by the solicitation. Proper completion and submission are necessary for proposal evaluation.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This Excel workbook provides a comprehensive list of "Auto-Relevant" NAICS Codes and Product/Service Codes (PSCs) across various domains. It is intended to help Offerors understand how to claim evaluation credit under the "Relevance" qualification factor for task orders issued under MA-IDIQ contracts.

• Instructions Sheet: Outlines how NAICS codes and PSCs are used for relevance verification, especially for task orders under Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (MA-IDIQ) contracts. It details requirements for submitting supporting documentation when the IDIQ's assigned NAICS code does not automatically validate the order-level NAICS code.
• Domain-Specific Sheets: Includes lists of "Auto-Relevant" NAICS Codes and PSCs for the following domains:
  • Technical & Engineering (TE)
  • Management & Advisory (MA)
  • Intelligence (INT)
  • Research & Development (RD)
  • Enterprise Solutions (ENT)
  • Facilities (FAC)
  • Environmental Services (ENV)
  • Logistics (LOG)
  • Business Administration (BA)
  • Social Services (SS)
  • Financial Services (FS)
  • Human Capital (HC)
  • Marketing and Public Relations
• Automatic Relevance Verification: Explains that Offerors can submit a Qualified Proposal (QP) for automatic relevance consideration if its assigned PSC or project-specific NAICS code matches a code listed in this workbook. Supporting documentation (FPDS report and/or contract award document) is required. Non-federal projects and federal subcontracts are ineligible for automatic relevance.

This document is crucial for bidders to identify which NAICS codes and PSCs are considered automatically relevant for the opportunity's domains. Understanding this list will help Offerors accurately claim "Relevance" evaluation credit and prepare the necessary supporting documentation for their proposals, particularly when dealing with task orders under MA-IDIQ contracts.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, Attachment J-2, outlines the requirements for reporting Task Order, Transactional Data, and Contract Access Fee (CAF) information. It details the specific data elements that contractors must report in the Government designated system for each task order issued under the Master Contract.

• Task Order Reporting Data Elements: Defines 52 specific data elements required for reporting, including Contract Number, PIID, Award Date, Description of Deliverable, Contract Type, Performance Based Contract indicator, GSA Assisted Services indicator, Issuing Agency & Bureau, Receiving Agency/Bureau, OCO Name, Period of Performance, Obligated/Funded Amounts, Total Estimated Value, and details on modifications.
• Invoice Reporting: Includes fields for invoice number, paid date, amount, CLIN, line item identifier, quantity, unit of measure, price paid per unit, and total price.
• Contract Access Fee (CAF) Reporting: Specifies fields for CAF line item amount, voucher number, remit payment date, and total CAF payment amount.
• Subcontracting Data: Requires reporting of subcontractor names, Unique Entity Identifiers (UEIs), total amount subcontracted for services, and similarly situated entity identification.
• Services Data: Details on type of work performed, place of performance, security clearance, applicable labor law, employee location, labor category, and indirect costs.
• OASIS+ CLIN Structure: Provides a table mapping OASIS+ Reporting CLINs to Reporting Line Types (e.g., Labor Categories, Cost Reimbursement Services, Fixed Price Services, Travel, Indirect Costs, Contract Access Fee).

This attachment is crucial for understanding the post-award reporting obligations for any task orders issued under the Master Contract. Bidders should review these requirements to ensure they have the systems and processes in place to accurately report transactional data, invoices, and contract access fees as required by the Government. Understanding the OASIS+ CLIN structure is also important for accurate invoicing and reporting.

Amendment / Modification

This document, Attachment J-4, provides Department of Defense (DoD) Required Provisions and Clauses for Task Orders. It is referenced in Section I.1.1 Contract Clauses and is provided for Task Orders solicited and issued under a Master Contract. Updates to these clauses may be executed via a unilateral contract modification. The matrix within this document is based on DFARS latest changes as of 11/10/2025, and it is recommended to review the latest DFARS on acquisition.gov.

This document details numerous DFARS provisions and clauses incorporated by reference, including but not limited to:

• DFARS 252.203-7005: Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DOD Officials
• DFARS 252.204-7008: Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls
• DFARS 252.209-7002: Disclosure of Ownership or Control by a Foreign Government
• DFARS 252.209-7008: Notice of Prohibition Relating to Organizational Conflict of Interest – Major Defense Acquisition Program
• DFARS 252.215-7008: Only One Offer
• DFARS 252.216-7002: Alternate A, Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour Proposal Requirements – Non-Commercial Item Acquisition with Adequate Price Competition
• DFARS 252.225-7003: Report of Intended Performance Outside the United States and Canada—Submission with Offer
• DFARS 252.225-7020: Trade Agreements Certificate-Basic
• DFARS 252.225-7031: Secondary Arab Boycott of Israel
• DFARS 252.225-7035: Buy America Act- Free Trade Agreements – Balance of Payment Program Certificate –Basic
• DFARS 252.234-7001: Notice of Earned Value Management System

It also includes full text provisions/representations and certifications, such as DFARS 252.204-7007, Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications (OCT 2025), and various other DFARS clauses related to contract administration, cost principles, property management, and personnel support for deployed forces.

Offerors must complete and return specified provisions with their Task Order proposals. The document outlines how to handle representations and certifications, including options for using SAM.gov or completing them within the solicitation. Failure to submit required documentation may render an offer ineligible for award.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "ATTACHMENT J.P-7 CTA Qualifications & MRCL List Template," provides a template for offerors to document their Contractor Teaming Arrangements (CTA) and Meaningful Relationship Commitments (MRCL) as required for proposals submitted under the OASIS+ contract families. It is intended to ensure transparency regarding team composition and capabilities.

• Section A: Collects information on Joint Venture (JV) entities, including the entity name, work done (experience and past performance), and qualifications (unique capabilities, business systems, certifications, clearances).
• Section B: Documents CTA subcontractor team members. It requires the Offering Entity Legal Name, SAM UEID, Solicitation Number, Contract Name, and Signature of Authorized Rep. It also includes a table to list Proposed Subcontractor Legal Name, SAM UEID, and Business Size at Time of Proposal Submission.
• Section C: Documents Meaningful Relationship Commitments. It requires similar information as Section B, along with a table to list MRCL Entity Legal Name, SAM UEID, Project(s), and Certifications/Systems/Resources Claimed.

Bidders must use this template to provide detailed information about their proposed teaming partners, subcontractors, and any meaningful relationships. This information is crucial for demonstrating the team's overall qualifications, capabilities, and compliance with solicitation requirements related to teaming and subcontracting. Specific instructions for Joint Venture Offerors and CTA with subcontractors are referenced within the document, directing bidders to relevant solicitation sections (L.5.1.3.1 and L.5.1.3.2).

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is Attachment J.P-3, the Project Verification Form, which is an amendment (Amd 0008). It is used to verify project experience for Offerors responding to the solicitation. It can be used for Customer (Federal and Non-Federal) project experience verification, Joint Venture (JV) project experience verification, and Multiple Award Schedule Contractor Teaming Arrangement (MAS CTA) project experience verification.

• Part I: Offeror Information: Collects details about the Offeror, including name and UEID, and JV/MRCL information if applicable.
• Part II: Project Identification: Details the project performed by the contractor, including project name, contract number, funding agency/customer, period of performance, total contract value, and NAICS/PSC code. It also includes fields for total project value performed by the Offeror/Member for JV/MAS CTA verification.
• Domain Relevance: Sections for Offerors to describe the relevance of the project to proposed Domains and provide quantitative data on the relevant work that meets or exceeds minimum QP (Qualified Project) thresholds.
• Part III: Project Qualifications: A checklist for Offerors to indicate which qualifications they meet, categorized by Integrated, Management & Staffing, Scale (All Offerors and Protégé), Specialized Functional Experience, Multiple & OCONUS Locations, Federal Experience (Competition, Cost-Reimbursement, Advanced R&D).
• Part IV: Customer Certification: Section for the customer (Contracting Officer or Corporate Official) to certify the contractor's performance.
• Part V: Joint Venture Certification: Section for a JV member to certify performance.
• Part VI: MAS CTA Member Certification: Section for a MAS CTA member to certify performance.

This form is critical for Offerors to document and verify their project experience as required by the solicitation. Bidders must accurately complete Parts I, II, and III, and ensure the relevant customer or certifying entity completes the appropriate certification sections (Parts IV, V, or VI). The information provided here directly supports the Offeror's claimed qualifications and is essential for proposal evaluation.

Forms / Attachments / Pricing Sheets

This document, Attachment J-5, is a Task Order Clause and Provision Matrix for the OASIS+ contract. Its purpose is to assist Ordering Contracting Officers (OCOs) and OASIS+ Contractors in identifying applicable clauses and provisions at the Task Order level. It is current as of FAC: 2025-06, dated 10/01/2025, and includes references to the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) by Deviation.

• The matrix lists various FAR clauses and provisions, their dates, and applicability to different contract types (Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, Time-and-Materials/Labor-Hour, Small Business, Unrestricted).
• It includes sections on Purpose and Use, Congressional Notification of Task Order Awards, Order of Precedence, Provisions Incorporated by Reference at Task Order Level, Section E (Inspection and Acceptance), Section F (Deliveries or Performance), and Section I (Contract Clauses).
• Specific subsections detail DoD Agency-specific and Department of Labor Agency-specific required provisions and clauses.
• The document also references external resources like the FAR Smart Matrix and Acquisition Regulation Comparator (ARC) tool for determining applicability.

This matrix is crucial for bidders as it outlines the specific contract clauses and provisions that will govern task orders issued under the OASIS+ Master Contract. Understanding these clauses is essential for accurately preparing proposals, understanding contractual obligations, and ensuring compliance. Bidders should pay close attention to the dates and any deviations noted, as these can impact contract terms. The matrix helps bidders anticipate the regulatory and contractual framework for potential task orders.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is an optional Subcontractor Letter of Commitment Template, current as of Amendment 0008. It serves as a formal commitment from a proposed subcontractor to a prime contractor for services under the OASIS+ Multi-Agency Contract (MAC), should the prime contractor be awarded a task order.

• Statement of Commitment: Outlines the subcontractor's agreement to provide services within a specified domain (e.g., Intelligence, Engineering, Logistics) as determined at the Task Order level. The commitment is valid for the duration of the awarded OASIS+ contract, including option periods.
• Authorization to Use Past Performance: Grants the prime contractor permission to include the subcontractor's project experience and past performance in their OASIS+ proposal.
• Limitations on Subcontracting: Acknowledges the requirements of FAR 52.219-14, stating that a small business concern will not pay more than 50% of the contract amount to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. This limitation applies only to the services portion of contracts that include both services and supplies.
• Legal Information: Requires insertion of legal names and Unique Entity IDs (UEID) from SAM.gov for both the prime and proposed subcontractor.
• Subcontractor Representative: Details for a representative of the subcontractor for validation purposes (Name, Title, Phone, Email).
• Authorized Signature: A section for the subcontractor's representative to sign, formally committing to provide services.

This template is crucial for potential subcontractors who wish to be part of a prime contractor's bid for OASIS+ contracts. It provides the structure for formally committing their services, authorizing the use of their past performance, and acknowledging subcontracting limitations. Prime contractors will likely require this completed form as part of their proposal submission.