Sole Source to Honeywell International Inc for Measurement Unit
Overview
Buyer
Place of Performance
NAICS
PSC
Set Aside
Original Source
Timeline
Qualification Details
Fit reasons
- NAICS alignment with historical contract wins in similar service areas.
- Scope strongly matches core technical capabilities and delivery model.
Risks
- Past performance thresholds may require one additional teaming partner.
- Potential clarification needed on staffing minimums before bid/no-bid.
Next steps
Validate eligibility requirements, assign capture owner, and schedule partner outreach to confirm teaming strategy before submission planning.
Quick Summary
The Department of the Navy, Naval Surface Warfare Center, is issuing a Sole Source award to Honeywell International Inc. for a Honeywell Measurement Unit (HG9900C1A-2020). This action is justified due to the item being part of a configuration-controlled system, where alternative brands would necessitate significant redesign, recertification, and associated delays and costs. The estimated value of this acquisition is greater than $25,000.
Scope of Work
The requirement is for a specific Honeywell Measurement Unit (HG9900C1A-2020). This unit is essential for replacing a fielded item within a configuration-controlled system, ensuring continued operational integrity without requiring costly and time-consuming system redesigns or recertifications.
Contract & Timeline
- Type: Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (Sole Source Justification)
- Contract Type: Firm-Fixed-Price (as per justification)
- Set-Aside: None (Sole Source)
- Response Date: June 8, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
- Published Date: June 3, 2026, 7:09 PM EDT
- Place of Performance: Panama City Beach, FL
Justification & Evaluation
Award will be made on a sole-source basis to Honeywell International Inc. The government has determined this represents the best value and lowest overall cost alternative to meet their needs, as market research did not identify other sources capable of fulfilling the requirement without incurring substantial additional costs and delays. The justification highlights that selecting an alternative brand would require a system redesign and recertification, leading to significant project delays and cost overruns. General contract clauses for supply contracts, including those related to delivery, payment, and various FAR provisions, are outlined in the accompanying document "C07 - Clauses-Supply.pdf", which also details evaluation factors (Price, Delivery, Quality, Past Performance) for general solicitations.
Additional Notes
This notice serves as a justification for a non-competitive award. The primary contact for this opportunity is Jamell L. Kilgore (jamell.l.kilgore.civ@us.navy.mil).