Z2DZ--Replace Failed Roofing B31 SPS Addition 538-26-202
Overview
Buyer
Place of Performance
NAICS
PSC
Set Aside
Original Source
Timeline
Qualification Details
Fit reasons
- NAICS alignment with historical contract wins in similar service areas.
- Scope strongly matches core technical capabilities and delivery model.
Risks
- Past performance thresholds may require one additional teaming partner.
- Potential clarification needed on staffing minimums before bid/no-bid.
Next steps
Validate eligibility requirements, assign capture owner, and schedule partner outreach to confirm teaming strategy before submission planning.
Quick Summary
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Network Contracting Office 10, sought bids for Project No. 538-26-202: Replace Failed Roofing B31 SPS Addition at the Chillicothe VA Medical Center in Chillicothe, Ohio. This procurement was a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside. The solicitation period has concluded, and an Abstract of Offers was published on April 29, 2026, detailing bids received from multiple contractors.
Project Scope
The project involves the complete removal of the existing failing EPDM roofing system on the B31 SPS Addition and the installation of a new EPDM roofing system. The existing roof suffered from adhesion failure between the insulation and concrete deck. The scope includes:
- Complete demolition and removal of existing EPDM membrane, insulation, flashings, and associated materials down to the structural deck.
- Inspection and repair of the exposed structural roof deck.
- Installation of a new tapered polyisocyanurate insulation system for proper drainage.
- Installation of a new 60-mil reinforced EPDM membrane system, fully adhered.
- Installation of all necessary accessories, including metal flashing, counter-flashing, wall coping, and retrofit drain assemblies.
- Temporary removal and re-installation of the existing lightning protection system by a qualified electrician.
- All work must adhere to industry standards, manufacturer specifications (e.g., Carlisle Sure-Seal 60-mil Reinforced EPDM or equivalent), and applicable building codes.
Contract Details
- Contract Type: Firm-Fixed-Price.
- Estimated Construction Cost: Between $500,000 and $1,000,000.
- Period of Performance: 75 calendar days from Notice to Proceed.
- Set-Aside: 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB).
- NAICS Code: 238160 (Roofing Contractors) with a $19.0 million size standard.
- Bonding Requirements: Bid, Payment, and Performance Bonds were required.
- Warranties: 5-year construction warranty (FAR 52.246-21) and a manufacturer's labor and material warranty.
Key Requirements & Personnel
- Eligibility: Offerors had to be verified SDVOSBs in MySBA Certifications and registered/active in SAM.gov.
- Performance: The SDVOSB prime contractor or subcontractor must perform at least 85% of the construction work.
- Superintendent: Must be directly employed by the Prime Contractor and on-site at all times work is commencing.
- Site Safety Health Officer (SSHO): Required for a minimum of once-daily inspections; competent persons must be on site. A single individual qualified for both Superintendent and SSHO roles was permissible due to project complexity.
- Personnel: All contractor employees are subject to background investigations (Non-Sensitive, Low Risk, Tier 1), VA Privacy Training, and annual influenza shots for on-campus work. Contractors must enroll in E-Verify.
- Wage Rates: Davis-Bacon Act prevailing wage rates (GDN OH20260053) applied.
Submission & Timeline
- Original Offer Due Date: April 21, 2026, 10:00 AM.
- Amended Offer Due Date: April 28, 2026, 10:00 AM.
- Site Visit: Held on March 26, 2026.
- RFI Due Date: April 1, 2026.
- Current Status: An Abstract of Offers was published on April 29, 2026, indicating the solicitation has closed and bids have been received.
Additional Notes
The project start date was not recommended later than July 15, 2026. No known Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) or lead was present. The contract is tax-exempt. Bidders were advised to account for protecting the structure and achieving a dry deck surface, as the existing roofing deck was saturated.