KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) Revision 2

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 2: Request for Technical Order Number," is a form used by contractors to request a Technical Order (TO) number for a manual. It serves as a standardized method for gathering essential information required by the government to assign a unique TO number.

• Mandatory Fields: The form requires specific information marked with an asterisk (*), including Prime System Application, Contract Number/Purchase Request, Mission Design Series/Nomenclature, Federal Stock Class, Part Number(s), NSN/FSN, Publication Type, Suggested Technical Order Number, Recommended Title of Manual, Classification of Manual, Classification of Title, Kind of Equipment, and Test Equipment.
• Contractor Information: Details about the vendor, including name, address, manufacturer's code, and point of contact.
• Equipment Details: Information about the equipment the manual pertains to, including its type, whether it's a COTS item, and if a similar manual already exists.
• Foreign Military Sales (FMS): Fields to indicate if the manual is for FMS and associated country codes.

This form is relevant to bidders who are responsible for developing technical manuals as part of a contract. It outlines the specific data they must provide to the government to obtain a TO number for their deliverables. Understanding and accurately completing this form is crucial for the successful submission and acceptance of technical documentation.

Forms / Attachments / Pricing Sheets

This document, "ATTACHMENT 3B - EXCEL PRICING WORKBOOK - SUB.xlsx", is a pricing workbook designed for subcontractors to input their cost proposals. It contains instructions and templates for detailing proposed labor rates, indirect rates, material costs, subcontractor costs, and other direct costs (ODCs) across various tasks and contract line item numbers (CLINs).

• Instructions Sheet: Provides guidance on completing the workbook, including which worksheets require Offeror input (highlighted in yellow), rounding rules for dollar amounts and percentages, and how the "SUMMARY" worksheet calculates the total proposed price.
• Cost Model Worksheets (CPIF CLINs 0001-0003): Detailed breakdowns for labor, material, subcontractor, and ODC costs are expected to be populated by the Offeror. These worksheets are linked to other sections for automatic calculation of totals.
• Rate Description Sheets: "SUB CPIF RATE DESC (ALL)" requires descriptions for labor categories and indirect rates.
• Summary Sheets: "SUMMARY", "CPIF CLIN 000X SUMMARY", and CLIN TOTAL sheets consolidate proposed pricing.

This workbook is crucial for subcontractors to accurately and completely submit their pricing information as required by the solicitation. It outlines the specific cost categories, tasks, and CLINs for which pricing data must be provided, ensuring alignment with the prime offeror's requirements and the government's solicitation structure. Bidders must follow the instructions carefully regarding data input, rounding, and linking of information to ensure their proposal is compliant and correctly evaluated.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document is a DRAFT Solicitation (FA810526RB001) for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh Revision 2. The solicitation outlines the requirements for supplies and services related to this refresh.

The solicitation details numerous Contract Line Items (CLINS) and Option Line Items (OLINS) that cover a wide range of activities and deliverables, including:

• Development and Testing: Various stages of development, testing, integration, and qualification for components and systems.
• Production: Manufacturing of A-KITS and B-KITS, including associated warranties and support equipment.
• Technical Documentation: Development and delivery of Technical Orders and other documentation.
• Support Services: Maintenance, repair, and support equipment.
• Program Management: Overall program management and P&D requirements.
• Specialized Items: Simulator Kits, Systems Integration Laboratory (SIL) development, and Data Submittals.

Specific CLINs reference SOW paragraphs for detailed requirements. The Product Service Code for most items is 1680.

• Contract Type: The government contemplates award of an IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity) contract.

• Period of Performance: The solicitation includes provisions for options to extend the term of the contract.

• Estimated Value: Not explicitly stated in the provided sections.

• Submission Deadline: Offers are due by 04:00 PM local time on July 31, 2026.

• Evaluation: Section M outlines the Evaluation Factors for Award.

• Key Deadlines: The solicitation includes a table of contents with references to various sections, including Instructions to Offerors (Section L) and Evaluation Factors for Award (Section M).

No specific set-aside information is immediately apparent in the reviewed sections. However, various FAR and DFARS clauses related to small business concerns and subcontracting are included.

• This is a DRAFT solicitation.
• The document includes numerous FAR and DFARS clauses incorporated by reference and in full text, covering areas such as contract administration, payment instructions, special contract requirements, representations and certifications, and evaluation factors.
• Section J lists 11 attachments, including the Statement of Work (SOW), Supporting Technical Documentation, Pricing Matrices, Instructions to Offerors, Evaluation Factors, Data Assertions, Security Classification Specification, Technical Manual Contract Requirements, DCAA Preaward Survey, and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).

Forms / Attachments / Pricing Sheets

This document is an Excel workbook (Attachment 3A) designed as a pricing matrix and cost model for prime offerors responding to the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) opportunity. It provides instructions and templates for submitting proposed pricing for various contract line item numbers (CLINs).

• Instructions: Details on how to complete the workbook, including highlighting required input cells, rounding rules for prices and rates, and how the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) is calculated.
• Pricing Matrix (FFP CLINs): Requires offerors to input unit prices and supporting information for Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) CLINs (X007-X021).
• Cost Model (CPIF CLINs): Outlines the structure for submitting proposed rates and costs for Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF) CLINs (0001-0003), including labor, material, subcontractor, and other direct costs.
• Specific Worksheets: Includes dedicated sheets for instructions, calculation methodology, summary, FFP CLIN inputs, spares inputs, CPIF rates, labor details, and detailed cost breakdowns for each CPIF CLIN and task.

This workbook is essential for bidders to accurately and completely submit their pricing proposals. It dictates the format, required data, and calculation methods for all cost-related aspects of the bid. Failure to follow these instructions may result in a non-compliant proposal. Bidders must carefully input all required data into the yellow-highlighted cells as per the instructions provided within the workbook.

Other / Unclassified

This document is a PDF portfolio wrapper, indicating that the actual content requires a specific PDF reader version (Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later) for optimal viewing. It does not contain substantive information about the opportunity itself.

Bidders should ensure they have the recommended software to access and review any attached documents related to this opportunity. This document serves as a technical prerequisite for accessing other potential attachments.

Other / Unclassified

This document is a flyer announcing an Industry Day for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) program. The virtual event is scheduled for March 25, 2026, and will be held via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of the Industry Day is to engage with industry partners, gather feedback, and inform the development of a comprehensive Request for Proposal (RFP), which is targeted for release in May 2026.

This document is relevant to potential bidders as it provides advance notice of an upcoming procurement. Key details for bidders include:

• Event Purpose: To engage industry, gather feedback on the Draft RFP, and discuss the upcoming procurement.
• Timeline: The RFP is targeted for release in May 2026, with an in-person tour opportunity at Tinker AFB scheduled for April 2026.
• Industry Input: Interested parties are encouraged to submit high-interest topics or common concerns to help shape the event and the RFP.
• Agenda: Includes a morning session for program information, clarifications, and Q&A, and afternoon one-on-one meetings by appointment.
• Registration: RSVP is required by March 16, 2026, with full names, email addresses, and a list of topics/concerns.
• Points of Contact: Brandi Shelden (Contracting Officer) and Alejandra Marchesano (Contract Specialist) are provided for inquiries.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This memorandum announces the posting of the Draft Solicitation and associated Draft Attachments for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) program for industry review. The purpose is to solicit feedback from industry on these draft documents.

The following draft attachments are provided for review:

• DRAFT (CUI) CCR Revision 2 Statement of Work (SOW)
• DRAFT (CUI) KC 135 CCR Revision 2 System Requirements Document (SRD)
• DRAFT CCR Section L - Instructions to Offerors
• DRAFT CCR Revision 2 Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award (as of 25 Feb)
• CCR Revision 2 Data Rights Assertion Matrix
• DRAFT TM 86 01R Air Force Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR)

Three additional attachments are not yet available and will be uploaded once finalized.

Industry is encouraged to review all documents and submit comments or questions no later than the close of business on 17 March 2026.

Not specified in this document.

• An Industry Day is anticipated on 25 March 2026, with additional details to be posted.
• All feedback should be directed to Ms. Brandi Shelden, Contracting Officer, at brandi.shelden@us.af.mil.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a draft Cost and Software Data Reporting Plan (CSDR Plan) for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh Development program. It outlines the requirements for reporting cost and software data throughout the contract lifecycle.

• Program Name: KC-135 Center Console Refresh
• Acquisition Category: ACAT II
• Commodity Type: Aircraft System
• Plan Iteration: Revision
• Submission Dates: Details current and last approved plan dates, with a current submission date of 20251218.
• Government Point of Contact: Christopher N. Shrader at Tinker AFB.
• Contractor Information: Currently TBD, with a placeholder contract number TBD- (AF-23-C1(R)).
• CSDR Submission Events: A detailed schedule of 22 events, including "Contract Award Cost Report," "Annual Cost Report," and "Technical Data Report," with associated "As of Dates" and "Due Dates" spanning from 2028 to 2038.
• Cost & Hour Report (FlexFile) Requirements: Specifies reporting for unit/sublot, end items, and common items, including Forecast at Completion (FAC) and WBS element definitions.
• Technical Data Report Requirements: Mandates UNCLASSIFIED/CUI information and notification if values are classified.
• Resource Distribution Table (RDT): Required for identifying subcontractors needing direct CSDR reporting.
• Contractor Business Data Report (CBDR): Preparation and submission requirements for Forward Pricing Rate Proposals.

This document is crucial for understanding the cost and software data reporting obligations that will be imposed on the prime contractor. Bidders should review the submission schedule, reporting requirements (FlexFile, Technical Data, RDT), and the defined Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) elements to assess the administrative and data management overhead associated with this program. The detailed submission events and their associated dates provide insight into the program's timeline and ongoing reporting expectations.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a "Pre-award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist." It is designed to gather information from prospective contractors regarding their accounting systems to ensure compliance with government contracting requirements.

The checklist consists of 22 questions covering various aspects of a contractor's accounting system, including:

• Prior DCAA audits and their outcomes.
• Compliance with Cost Accounting Standards (CAS).
• Adequacy of the accounting system for government contracts.
• Segregation of direct and indirect costs.
• Identification and accumulation of costs by contract.
• Allocation of indirect costs.
• General ledger control and cost accumulation.
• Timekeeping and labor distribution systems.
• Interim determination of costs.
• Exclusion of unallowable costs.
• Identification of costs by contract line item and units.
• Segregation of preproduction costs.
• Financial information for limitation of cost/payments clauses.
• Support for progress payment requests.
• Data for pricing follow-on acquisitions.
• Plans and current performance on Cost-Type contracts.

Prospective bidders, particularly those intending to bid on cost-type contracts, must complete this checklist. The responses and any required explanations will be used by the government to assess the adequacy and compliance of the bidder's accounting system. Failure to provide sufficient detail or demonstrate an adequate accounting system may impact a contractor's ability to be awarded a contract. Bidders should pay close attention to the instructions regarding the submission of supporting documentation, such as DCAA audit reports.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document is a draft DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification. It is provided as an attachment to the SAM.gov opportunity record.

• The form outlines the security classification requirements for a contract, including:
  • Classification levels for the prime contractor and any subcontractors.
  • Information on the facility clearance.
  • Handling and safeguarding instructions for classified information.
  • Points of contact for security matters.

Bidders should review this document to understand the security requirements associated with the potential contract. This includes determining if their organization possesses the necessary security clearances and capabilities to handle classified information, which may be a critical factor in their ability to perform the work and submit a compliant proposal.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "DRAFT CCR Revision 2 Data Rights Assertion Matrix," serves as an attachment (RFP Attachment 6) requiring offerors to provide a completed matrix detailing data rights asserted or proposed for all modification items. It outlines how offerors should disclose the data rights status or public domain status of proposed modification items, including software, firmware, and hardware.

• Data Rights Assertion Matrix: Offerors must complete this matrix, indicating data rights asserted/proposed in Column H and providing rationale/comments in Column I.
• Disclosure Requirement: The status of data rights or public domain status for all proposed modification items must be disclosed.
• Impact Explanation: If assertions impact fielded system sustainment and repairs, offerors must explain how.
• Restrictions: If an offeror intends to assert restrictions on the DoD's ability to use, release, or disclose, they must explain why the item does not fit statutory/regulatory provisions for acquiring unlimited rights.
• Format: Offerors shall not add rows or columns to the matrix. Explanations should be included in the technical volume if applicable.
• Data Item Descriptions (DIDs): The document lists numerous DIDs with associated SOW references, CLINs, and asserted rights (e.g., Government Purpose Rights - GPR, Unlimited Rights - UR, Limited Rights - LR, Restricted Rights - RR).
• Rights Categories: A table defines various rights categories (Unlimited Rights, Government Purpose Rights, Limited Rights, Restricted Rights, Specifically Negotiated License Rights, SBIR Rights, Commercial Technical Data License Rights, Commercial Computer Software Licenses) and their applicability and permitted uses.

This attachment is critical for bidders to understand and properly document their assertions regarding intellectual property and data rights for any proposed modifications. Failure to complete this matrix accurately and comprehensively could impact proposal evaluation and future contract performance. Bidders must pay close attention to the specific DIDs listed and the corresponding rights categories required by the Government.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 5 Section M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD," outlines the criteria and methodology the U.S. Air Force will use to evaluate proposals for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) acquisition. It details how proposals will be assessed to determine the best value award.

• Source Selection Procedures: Utilizes Tradeoff Source Selection for an integrated assessment of proposals.
• Basis for Contract Award: Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal conforms to requirements and represents the best value, potentially to a higher-rated, higher-priced Offeror if the technical advantages outweigh the price difference.
• Evaluation Factors:
  • Factor 1: Technical: Assessed through four subfactors:
    • Technical Solution (Acceptable/Unacceptable)
    • Exceeding Requirements and Demonstrating System Strengths (Acceptable, Good, Outstanding - used for trade-offs)
    • Data Rights (Acceptable/Unacceptable)
    • Schedule (Acceptable/Unacceptable)
  • Factor 2: Technical Risk: Evaluated for potential disruption, cost increases, or performance degradation (Low, Moderate, High, Unacceptable).
  • Factor 3: Past Performance: Assessed based on recency, relevancy, and quality of past performance (Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence).
  • Factor 4: Price: Evaluated for reasonableness, balance, cost realism (for CPIF CLINs), and price realism (for FFP CLINs).
• Relative Importance: Technical Subfactor 2, Technical Risk, and Past Performance are individually more important than Price. Combined, these three factors are significantly more important than Price.
• Proposal Submission: Details requirements for technical volumes, cost/price volumes, Excel Pricing Workbook, and cost/price narrative.

This document is critical for bidders as it defines the specific criteria against which their proposals will be judged. Understanding these evaluation factors, their relative importance, and the rating methodologies is essential for developing a compliant and competitive proposal that maximizes the chances of receiving a best-value award.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 4 Section L - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS," provides detailed guidance for potential bidders on how to prepare and submit their proposals for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) program. It outlines the structure, content, and submission requirements for all proposal volumes.

• Proposal Organization: Specifies the required volumes (Technical, Past Performance, Price, Contract Documentation) and their contents.
• Submission Instructions: Details the electronic submission process via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module, including file naming conventions and deadlines.
• Evaluation Factors: Outlines the four evaluation factors: Technical (including subfactors for Technical Solution, Exceeding Requirements, Data Rights, and Schedule), Technical Risk, Past Performance, and Price.
• Format and Content Requirements: Provides specific instructions on page limitations, font types, margins, numbering, and the inclusion of tables, figures, and glossaries.
• Pricing Information: Details requirements for cost/price proposals, including the use of Excel Pricing Workbooks (EPW), cost realism analysis, and subcontractor pricing.
• Attachments: Lists required attachments, such as Past Performance Information Forms (PPIF), Consent Letters, Client Authorization Letters, Commitment to Perform Letters, Proposed Team Lists, and Small Business Participation Commitment Documents (SBPCD).

This document is critical for any vendor intending to bid on the KC-135 CCR opportunity. It serves as the primary guide for understanding how to structure, prepare, and submit a compliant and competitive proposal. Adherence to these instructions is mandatory for eligibility and successful evaluation.

Solicitation / RFP / RFQ

This document outlines the "Evaluation Factors for Award" for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) acquisition. The government intends to award a single contract using Tradeoff Source Selection procedures, aiming for a best-value decision. This approach allows for tradeoffs between technical factors and price.

The evaluation will be based on four factors:

• Factor 1: Technical (rated Acceptable/Unacceptable for Subfactors 1, 3, 4; rated Acceptable, Good, or Outstanding for Subfactor 2)

  • Subfactor 1: Technical Solution
  • Subfactor 2: Exceeding Requirements and Demonstrating System Strengths
  • Subfactor 3: Data Rights
  • Subfactor 4: Schedule

• Factor 2: Technical Risk

• Factor 3: Past Performance

• Factor 4: Price

• A single contract will be awarded.

• The government reserves the right to not award a contract.

• Proposals will be evaluated against all source selection criteria.

• Technical Subfactors 1, 3, and 4 are prerequisites for award and will be rated Acceptable (Green) or Unacceptable (Red). A single deficiency in any of these subfactors will result in an Unacceptable rating.

• Subfactor 2 (Exceeding Requirements and Demonstrating System Strengths) will be rated using a color method (Blue, Purple, Green, Yellow, Red) and is the only technical subfactor where tradeoff considerations will be applied based on identified strengths/significant strengths.

• Technical Risk, Past Performance, and Price will also be evaluated.

• The SSA will conduct an integrated assessment of all factors to determine the best value.

• Discussions are not intended but may be conducted if necessary.

• Offerors must possess or acquire a final facility clearance equal to the highest classification specification (DD254) prior to the Source Selection Authority Decision Brief.

• Offerors must meet all solicitation requirements, terms, and conditions.

• Small business participation is a requirement for Subfactor 1, with a minimum of 30% proposed participation.

• This document is a DRAFT and is dated 27 February 2026.

• The evaluation process is governed by FAR Part 15, DFARS, DAFFARS, and DoD Source Selection Procedures.

• Site visits are not planned.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 4 - DRAFT CCR Section L - Instructions to Offerors," provides detailed guidance for potential offerors on how to prepare and submit their proposals for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) program. It outlines the structure, content, and submission requirements for proposals.

• Proposal Structure: Details the organization of proposal volumes (Technical, Past Performance, Price, Contract Documentation) and their respective subfactors and content requirements.
• Submission Instructions: Specifies electronic submission via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module, including file naming conventions and format requirements (searchable PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint).
• Page Limitations: Outlines page limits for various sections and specifies what is excluded from these limits.
• Evaluation Factors: Briefly references Section M for evaluation criteria, indicating that proposals will be evaluated against technical subfactors, technical risk, past performance, and price.
• Key Deadlines & Milestones: Mentions proposal acceptance periods and the importance of timely submission.
• Attachments: Lists numerous required attachments, including Past Performance Information Forms (PPIF), Consent Letters, Commitment to Perform Letters, Proposed Team Lists, Small Business Participation Commitment Documents (SBPCD), and Pricing Matrices.

This document is critical for any vendor intending to bid on the KC-135 CCR opportunity. It dictates precisely how proposals must be structured, what information must be included in each section, and the method of submission. Failure to adhere to these instructions could result in a non-responsive or ineligible proposal. Offerors must pay close attention to the detailed requirements for each subfactor, past performance submission, and pricing, as well as the specific formatting and electronic submission protocols.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 5 - CUI CCR Revision 2 Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award," outlines the criteria and methodology the U.S. Air Force will use to evaluate proposals for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) acquisition. It details how offerors will be assessed to determine the best value award.

• Basis for Contract Award: Utilizes Tradeoff Source Selection procedures for a best-value decision, considering technical proposals, technical risk, past performance, and price.
• Evaluation Factors:
  • Factor 1: Technical: Assessed through four subfactors: Technical Solution, Exceeding Requirements and Demonstrating System Strengths, Data Rights, and Schedule. Subfactors 1, 3, and 4 are pass/fail (Acceptable/Unacceptable), while Subfactor 2 allows for tradeoffs.
  • Factor 2: Technical Risk: Evaluates the likelihood of schedule disruption, performance degradation, or increased oversight.
  • Factor 3: Past Performance: Assesses the offeror's demonstrated record of performance, considering recency, relevancy, and quality.
  • Factor 4: Price: (Section to be added by the Program Office).
• Evaluation Methodology: Proposals will be evaluated concurrently. Technical Subfactors 1, 3, and 4 will be rated Acceptable (Green) or Unacceptable (Red). Subfactor 2 will be rated Acceptable, Good, or Outstanding. Technical Risk will be rated Low, Moderate, High, or Unacceptable. Past Performance will receive a confidence assessment rating. An integrated assessment of these factors will determine the best value.
• Facility Clearance: Offerors must possess a final facility clearance equal to the highest classification specification (DD254) prior to the Source Selection Authority Decision Brief.

This document is critical for bidders as it defines the specific criteria and weighting used to evaluate their proposals. Understanding these evaluation factors, subfactors, and rating methods is essential for developing a compliant and competitive proposal that addresses the government's priorities and maximizes the potential for a favorable award decision. It highlights the importance of technical approach, risk mitigation, past performance, and schedule, in addition to price.

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment 3 Section L - Instructions to Offerors," provides detailed guidance for potential bidders on how to prepare and submit their proposals for the KC-135 Center Console Refresh (CCR) program. It outlines the structure, content, and submission requirements for proposals.

• Proposal Structure: Details the organization of proposal volumes (Technical, Past Performance, Price, Contract Documentation) and their respective subfactors and content.
• Submission Instructions: Specifies electronic submission via the PIEE Solicitation Module, including file naming conventions and format requirements (e.g., searchable PDF, Word, Excel).
• Page Limitations: Outlines page limits for various sections and specifies which elements are excluded from these limits.
• Evaluation Factors: Briefly references Section M for evaluation criteria, emphasizing that proposals will be evaluated based on the information presented.
• Key Deadlines & Milestones: Mentions proposal acceptance period and the importance of timely submission.
• Required Attachments: Lists numerous required attachments, including Past Performance Information Forms (PPIF), Consent Letters, Client Authorization Letters, Commitment to Perform Letters, Proposed Team List, Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD), and Pricing Matrix.
• Past Performance: Provides extensive instructions on how to complete the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) and utilize the PPI Tool for submission.

This document is critical for any vendor intending to bid on the KC-135 CCR program. It dictates the format, content, and submission method for proposals, and failure to comply with these instructions may result in a non-responsive or ineligible proposal. Bidders must carefully review all sections to ensure their proposal meets all requirements.