FX74 Strategic Airlift Hangar, Naval Station Rota, Spain

Form / Attachment / Pricing Sheet

This document, "Attachment G," requires offerors to certify their registration and classification status in accordance with Spanish law for participation in the solicitation. It outlines the requirements for companies based in Spain and those from non-EU or other EU member nations.

• Responsibility: Contracting companies and subcontractors are responsible for complying with Spanish law regarding registration and classifications.
• Spanish-based or Non-EU Companies: Must be registered in the Official Register of Bidders and Contractors of the Spanish Ministry of Finance with classifications applicable to the project, prior to proposal submission.
• Other EU Member Nation Companies: May substitute the classification requirement by self-certifying their capacity to work is accredited through their parent country's Mercantile/Industrial Official Registry.
• Applicable Classifications: A table lists specific GROUP, SUB-GROUP, and CATEGORY classifications relevant to the work proposed.
• Certification: Offerors must certify by checking a box whether they are listed in the Spanish Official Register or are a Non-Spanish offeror from another EU member nation with accreditation.
• Signature Block: Includes fields for Signature of Authorized Signer, Printed Name of Signer, Offering Entity, Office/Position of Signer, Date of Signature, and Offering Entity Unique ID/CAGE Code.

This attachment is critical for bidders to understand and fulfill the registration and classification requirements mandated by the Spanish government for this opportunity. Failure to comply with these requirements may impact proposal eligibility or award.

Amendment / Modification

• Specification section 00 22 13.00 20 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS has been removed in its entirety.

• For Specification 25 05 11.01 CYBERSECURITY FOR HVAC FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS, paragraph 1.1 "CONTROL SYSTEM APPLICABILITY" has been added.

• For Specification 25 05 11.02 CYBERSECURITY FOR FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS, paragraph 1.1 "CONTROL SYSTEM APPLICABILITY" has been added, and the "UFC PROCESS CHECKLIST" has been added as an attachment to the end of the specification.

• For Specification 25 05 11.03 CYBERSECURITY FOR ELECTRICAL FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS, paragraph 1.1 "CONTROL SYSTEM APPLICABILITY" has been added.

• A note regarding "FIRE BARRIER TO EXTEND ONE METER ABOVE LOW ROOF MIN" in NAVFAC DWG NO. 14147213 (A-302) BUILDING SECTION has been clarified, indicating it is typical where fire-rated hangar walls extend above adjacent low roof areas.

• Specification 00 22 13.00 20

• Specification 25 05 11.01

• Specification 25 05 11.02 (including addition of an attachment)

• Specification 25 05 11.03

• NAVFAC DWG NO. 14147213 (A-302) BUILDING SECTION

This document details modifications to existing specifications and drawings. Bidders should review these changes carefully to ensure their proposals accurately reflect the updated requirements, particularly concerning cybersecurity for control systems and building section details.

Justification and Approval (J&A) for Other Than Full and Open Competition

This document justifies the use of "Brand-Name" equipment for the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) program by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Europe Africa Southwest Asia (NAVFAC EURAFSWA). It seeks approval for a sole-source acquisition of specific Schneider Electric and AirMagnet/Firetide products.

• Schneider Electric PowerLogic ION 8650 and 7650 electric meters
• Schneider Electric PM 850 Remote Terminal Unit (RTU)
• AirMagnet model A5200 Wireless Intrusion Detection Sensors (WIDS)
• Firetide Model 7010 radios

These items are required to maintain compatibility with the existing AMI network, support data collection, analysis, reporting, and network protection, and align with specific Unified Facilities Guide Specification sections for metering.

• The estimated value for this J&A is $1,800,000.

• This justification covers only the specified brand-name items; other aspects of the AMI program will be acquired competitively.

• The proposed action will be synopsized on the Government-wide Point of Entry as sole brand availability.

• The Government will accept only prices determined to be fair and reasonable.

• This is a justification for other than full and open competition, citing 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) and FAR 6.302-1(c) due to the requirement for a single responsible source.

• The use of different metering and wireless devices would result in significant duplication of costs, endanger the existing AMI system's warranty, and violate the Platform Risk Assessment (PRA) accreditation.

• No additional market research was conducted as it was deemed not practicable.

• NAVFAC EURAFSWA has no current plans to compete future contracts for these specific items, but will assess feasibility if other potential sources emerge.

Class Justification and Approval (Other Than Full and Open Competition)

This document justifies the use of other than full and open competition to procure Siemens Desigo brand name commercial equipment for Building Control Systems (BCS) at Naval Station (NAVSTA) Rota. This equipment is required for interface with existing networked facilities controls and monitoring systems.

• Procurement of Siemens Desigo programmable building controllers and associated software.

• Controllers must be compatible with the NAVSTA Rota Facilities DDC System.

• Standardization is required to improve cybersecurity, operational effectiveness, and maintenance efficiency.

• The authority for this justification expires on May 10, 2026.

• The estimated total value for Siemens Desigo equipment through May 10, 2026, is $2,800,000.

• This document is a justification for a sole-source procurement, not a solicitation for proposals.

• The statutory authority cited is 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(1) (FAR 6.302-1).

• This justification is for other than full and open competition, specifically citing Siemens Desigo as the only viable source.

• Efforts to solicit offers from other vendors via a Sources Sought announcement on July 6, 2021, yielded zero responses.

• A business case analysis indicates that maintaining a standardized system will save the Government over $740,000 per year compared to a non-standardized system.

• The requirement to use Siemens Desigo software does not restrict who can install, configure, commission, test, maintain, or operate the controllers; there are sufficient providers in the market for these services.

Justification and Approval (J&A)

This document justifies the use of other than full and open competition for telecommunications work at Naval Station (NAVSTA) Rota, Spain. It seeks approval to utilize Telefónica of Spain as the sole source provider for Outside Plant (OSP) telecommunications cable plant construction.

• Engineering, provision, installation, testing, and certification of the outside telecommunications cable plant.

• This work is required to support current and future construction projects under NAVSTA Rota's Multiple Award Construction Contracts (MACC and mini-MACC).

• The OSP includes cable, conduit, manholes, poles, and associated hardware to provide signal paths to facilities.

• The authority for this justification expires on September 30, 2028.

• The total estimated cost for future OSP telecommunications work over the life of this justification is $7,000,000, broken down as:

  • MILCON: $5,000,000
  • O&MN: $600,000
  • Other: $1,400,000

• Not applicable, as this is a justification for sole-source procurement, not a solicitation for proposals.

• This justification is for "other than full and open competition" based on the "only one responsible source" authority (10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(1)).

• Telefónica is identified as the only viable source due to its ownership and control of the existing infrastructure and its refusal to allow third-party access.

• The estimated cost to duplicate the existing infrastructure is $13,000,000, which would cause unacceptable delays for seven ongoing MILCON projects.

• Market research included a Sources Sought notice posted on SAM.gov on May 7, 2024. Only one response was received, and that firm was deemed not viable due to lack of experience in the relevant region and the significant investment required.

• The Contracting Officer has determined the anticipated cost to be fair and reasonable.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0002) to RFP N62470-26-R-0008 makes the following changes:

• Proposal Submission Deadline Extended: The due date for proposal submission has been extended to Thursday, 12 March 2026, by 2:00 PM Norfolk, VA local time.

• Price Proposal Form Requirement Clarified: Submitting a complete Price Proposal Form, utilizing the most recent version issued by amendment (if applicable), is now a mandatory requirement. Failure to do so will constitute a material deficiency, making the proposal ineligible for award.

• Contract Completion Time Revised: The contractor shall begin within 15 calendar days and complete performance within 1200 calendar days after notice to proceed. If options are exercised, the contract completion date remains 1200 calendar days after award of the contract. The exercise of any options will not extend this completion date.

• Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) Addressed: Responses are provided for inquiries regarding:

  • Clarification of contract completion dates.
  • Project award and notice-to-proceed dates (no additional information provided).
  • Requirements for certificates of classification and subcontractor compliance.
  • Compliance with DFARS 252.204-7020 and Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) scores for both prime contractors and subcontractors (required prior to contract award).

• New Attachments Provided: New attachments, including a redacted Justification & Approvals, Continuation Sheet, and Attachment G, have been added.

• Solicitation text related to proposal submission and contract completion.

• Price Proposal Form submission requirements.

• Responses to specific inquiries (PPIs).

• Attachments.

• The proposal submission deadline has been extended.

• Failure to use the correct Price Proposal Form can lead to ineligibility.

• Contract completion timelines have been updated.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0002) to Solicitation N6247026R0008 revises the solicitation for the FX74 Strategic Airlift Hangar at Naval Station Rota, Spain. Key changes include:

• Extending the proposal submission deadline from February 26, 2026, to March 12, 2026.

• Responding to pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs).

• Adding new attachments: applicable redacted Justification & Approvals, Continuation Sheet, and Attachment G.

• Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements: The 'Response Due Date' has been changed.

• Section 00 73 00 - Supplementary Conditions: New attachments have been added.

The proposal submission deadline has been extended to March 12, 2026. Bidders should review the newly added attachments and the responses to pre-proposal inquiries.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0001) to Solicitation N6247026R0008 for the FX74 Strategic Airlift Hangar at Naval Station Rota, Spain, serves two primary purposes:

1. Revise the Solicitation: Section 00 21 00, specifically subsection 4.3 regarding Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs), has been updated. The revised text clarifies that the Government does not intend to respond to PPIs submitted after February 11, 2026. Previously, the cutoff was 15 business days before the solicitation closing date.

2. Respond to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs): The amendment addresses five specific inquiries from potential bidders:

   • Inquiry 1 (Offer Guarantee): Clarifies that an offer guarantee is not required, despite an indication in Standard Form 1442, Block 13b. Bidders should refer to the revised solicitation.
   • Inquiry 2 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification - UFGS 08 34 16.20, para 2.2.1): Confirms that specific paragraphs removed from the standard UFGS 08 34 16.20 language were intentionally omitted. Manufacturers using alternative methods not explicitly stated in the revised specification will not be considered.
   • Inquiry 3 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification - UFGS 08 34 16.20, para 2.3.3.2): Similar to Inquiry 2, this confirms that removed paragraphs related to Door Leaf Safety Arresters were intentionally omitted. Manufacturers utilizing these UFGS alternative methods will not be considered.
   • Inquiry 4 (PPI Submission Deadline): Addresses the timing of PPI submissions relative to the site visit. The Government will not respond to inquiries submitted after February 11, 2026.
   • Inquiry 5 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification - repeated): This inquiry appears to be a duplicate of Inquiry 2, reiterating the question about removed paragraphs in section 2.2.1 and 2.3.3.2 of the UFGS specification. The response remains the same: manufacturers utilizing alternative methods will not be considered.

• Section 00 21 00, Subsection 4.3 (Pre-Proposal Inquiries)

• UFGS 08 34 16.20, Paragraphs 2.2.1 and 2.3.3.2 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification)

• The deadline for responding to pre-proposal inquiries has been clarified.

• Specific technical requirements within the Vertical Lift Fabric Door specification are confirmed as intended, and alternative methods will not be considered.

Amendment / Modification

This amendment (0001) to Solicitation N6247026R0008 serves two primary purposes:

1. Revise the Solicitation: Specifically, Section 00 21 00 regarding Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) has been updated. The original solicitation stated that PPIs submitted less than 15 business days before the closing date would not be reviewed. The revised section clarifies that the Government will not respond to PPIs submitted after February 11, 2026.

2. Respond to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs): The amendment addresses five specific inquiries from potential bidders:

   • Inquiry 1 (Offer Guarantee): Clarifies that an offer guarantee is not required, despite an indication on Standard Form 1442, Block 13b. Bidders should refer to the revised solicitation for details.
   • Inquiry 2 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification - Paragraphs Removed): Addresses the removal of specific paragraphs from UFGS 08 34 16.20. The Government confirms these omissions were intentional to convey specific requirements for hangar doors. Manufacturers using the omitted UFGS alternative methods will not be considered.
   • Inquiry 3 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification - Safety Arrester Alternative): Similar to Inquiry 2, this addresses the removal of paragraphs related to door leaf safety arresters from UFGS 08 34 16.20. The Government confirms these omissions were intentional for the hangar door requirements, and manufacturers using these alternative methods will not be considered.
   • Inquiry 4 (PPI Due Date): Regarding the PPI deadline, the Government reiterates that it will not respond to inquiries submitted after February 11, 2026, as detailed in the amendment.
   • Inquiry 5 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification - Paragraphs Removed): This inquiry is identical to Inquiry 2 and receives the same response: the omissions were intentional for the hangar door requirements, and alternative UFGS methods will not be considered.

• Section 00 21 00 (Pre-Proposal Inquiries)

• UFGS 08 34 16.20 (Vertical Lift Fabric Door Specification) - specific paragraphs related to fabric door leaves and safety arresters have been intentionally edited.

• The deadline for submitting pre-proposal inquiries has been clarified (no responses after February 11, 2026).

• Bidders must adhere to the revised specification for Vertical Lift Fabric Doors, as alternative methods previously allowed under UFGS will not be considered for this solicitation.